Skip to Main Content U.S. Department of Energy
Energy and Environment Directorate
Page 37 of 1012

Research Highlights

Highlights Archive

Portland LEAPs Ahead on Energy Efficiency

Data comparison method could help prioritize commercial building upgrades

April 2018
Revised Energy Standard Determined to Foster Greater Energy Efficiency in Commercial Buildings
PNNL data analysis helped pinpoint which office buildings in Portland, Oregon were the best candidates to reduce energy use through retrofits. (Photo: Tabitha Mort, Creative Commons Zero)

The city of Portland, Oregon, has always been serious about saving energy in its buildings. In fact, the city’s website displays maps and spreadsheets showing the energy performance of hundreds of commercial buildings, ranking them from lowest to highest performers.

But how do Portland permitting officials and building owners decide which buildings to prioritize for energy-saving retrofits? Thanks in part to PNNL research, these decision makers now have a better way to see which buildings could provide the biggest boosts in energy savings.

Portland already knows how much energy its commercial buildings use. Since 2015, the city has required owners of commercial buildings larger than 20,000 square feet to track and report annual energy use. This policy covers nearly 80 percent of the commercial square footage and approximately 1,000 buildings.

But there is a gap. City officials didn’t know about the expected energy performance of these structures, making it difficult to identify the best opportunities for building upgrades.

Expected vs. Actual Energy Use

Here’s how it works. Utility bills can help identify actual energy use of a building, but they don’t tell you whether high energy use is caused by longer than usual operational hours or inefficient systems. So, if you knew how much energy a building should be using—based on its lighting, HVAC systems, insulation, and so on—but it’s actually using much more than that, you could prioritize that building for a more in-depth energy assessment and perhaps even upgrades. It’s a smart bet because you know that the building has the potential to perform much better than it has been.

To help Portland explore this idea in more depth, the U.S. Department of Energy awarded the city financial assistance through the Cities Leading through Energy Analysis and Planning (Cities-LEAP) program. The Portland LEAP project had two objectives: First, identify key building characteristics that would predict energy performance, and second, analyze and compare measured and predicted energy performance.

Energy Assessments Yield Insights

The Building Energy Asset Score
The Building Energy Asset Score rates a building’s energy efficiency from 1 to 10 and suggests upgrade opportunities for energy savings. In this example, the building scored 4.5, but with recommended upgrades, could score a 7.0, saving 29% of the energy it is currently using. Enlarge Image

PNNL research engineer Supriya Goel assisted Portland with a PNNL-developed software tool called the Building Energy Asset Score to evaluate an initial group of 26 Portland office buildings. The tool uses an energy model to score a building’s expected energy efficiency, based on its design and characteristics. It assesses the as-designed efficiency of a building, regardless of how it is operated.

Think of the Asset Score like the fuel economy stickers on new cars, that tell you how many miles per gallon that vehicle is supposed to give under standard driving conditions. But instead of fuel economy, the Asset tool tells you how much energy your building should be using.

Portland LEAP – Research Partners

  • City of Portland, Bureau of Planning and Sustainability – commissioned and led the study
  • Whole Building Solutions – assessed the expected energy use of 26 office buildings
  • The Cadmus Group, LLC – compared the expected vs. actual energy and analyzed data for additional insights
  • Technical Advisory Group – provided technical support and assistance:
    • Energy Trust of Oregon
    • EarthAdvantage
    • New Building Institute
    • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • U.S. Department of Energy – provided LEAP project funding to Portland

Goel assisted Portland’s subcontractor, Whole Building Solutions, in developing the Asset scores for the 26 buildings. That company provided the energy ratings to The Cadmus Group, LLC, which compared them with how much energy the buildings actually used. The results showed which buildings had the best opportunities to improve energy performance through upgrades. Energy consumption was most affected by lighting and HVAC system efficiency and controls.

Based on the study results, Energy Trust of Oregon will conduct follow-on research on some of the highest-opportunity buildings, comparing energy use before and after building retrofits. In addition, Portland and its partners are planning ways to share the project research and lessons learned with other cities.

Research Significance

This study is important because it showed that this kind of data comparison and analysis can save money and time when Portland looks at building energy efficiency opportunities. It’s like a screening tool. If Portland officials know which buildings could benefit from a more detailed assessment, they could send on-site auditors only to those buildings to identify specific upgrades that would help.

The study was also important because it showed the continuing value of the Building Energy Asset Score tool. PNNL developed the tool and the rating system, with funding from the U.S. Department of Energy’s Building Technologies Office. The Asset Score is now a free, national standardized tool for assessing the physical and structural energy efficiency of commercial and multifamily residential buildings.

This research was funded by DOE’s Office of Strategic Programs within the Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy.

PNNL Cities LEAP Research Team: Supriya Goel and Nora Wang

PNNL Asset Score Team: Nora Wang, Supriya Goel, David Millard, Edward Ellis, Trisha Henriksen, Richard Fowler, Juan Gonzalez, Alex Vlachokostas, and Mark Borkum


Page 37 of 1012

Energy and Environment

Core Research Areas

Resources

Contacts